By Prince Emmanuel Kanu
The Kanu family strongly condemns the shameful and deliberate misrepresentation of the court proceedings in the ongoing trial of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, as reported by certain media outlets. The article titled “Nnamdi Kanu Admitted Inciting Public to Attack Police, Witness Tells Court” is a blatant distortion of the truth, designed to mislead the public and tarnish the global reputation of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. This disgraceful journalism reflects a disturbing trend of anti-Biafra and Igbo-hating sentiments that prioritize sensationalism over factual reporting.
What Transpired in Court on May 6, 2025
The resumed hearing at the Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by the Honourable Justice James Omotosho, exposed the prosecution’s weak and embarrassing case. The cross-examination of the prosecution’s witness, PW-AAA from the Department of State Services (DSS), revealed a shocking lack of awareness regarding the charges against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. The witness repeatedly admitted ignorance of critical details, including:
▪︎The filing of a 15-count charge against the defendant.
▪︎The striking out of several charges by a trial judge.
▪︎The specific allegations of inciting the public to destroy public properties or furthering terrorism by directing attacks on government properties in Lagos.
Most notably, when questioned about a charge alleging incitement to destroy government properties, the witness confirmed awareness of the allegation but was unaware that the court had struck it out. This testimony directly contradicts the false narrative peddled by … and other media outlets claiming that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu “admitted” to inciting the public. The witness’s response of “I’m not aware” cannot, by any stretch of logic or ethics, be twisted into an admission of guilt by the defendant.
Furthermore, the prosecution…was (allegedly) caught in a flagrant act of deceit. (He) falsely claimed to have filed a process on April 28, 2025, when, in reality, he merely submitted a list not a statement of items the prosecution hoped to rely on as evidence-in-chief on May 5, 2025—four years after allegedly obtaining a statement from witness PW2-BBB. This list was neither filed as required by law nor served on the defendant, a clear violation of due process. Justice Omotosho, in his commitment to fairness, cautioned (him) to adhere to legal procedures and serve all required processes.
The Prosecution’s Sham Case and Media Collusion
The Kanu family is appalled by the prosecution’s reliance on unsubstantiated allegations and their failure to produce any credible evidence in court. Witness PW2-BBB, who Mazi Nnamdi Kanu described as a “mercenary hired to testify against him,” is not an SSS officer based at the national headquarters in Abuja and is unknown to the defendant. The prosecution’s attempt to present baseless claims through this witness, without tendering any evidence, is a mockery of justice.
Equally troubling is the media’s role in amplifying falsehoods while ignoring the substance of the case. Instead of focusing on the prosecution’s deceit and the court’s exasperation with their antics, certain media houses have chosen to sensationalise trivial matters, such as the exclusion of Princess Favour Kanu, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s sister-in-law, from the courtroom for streaming the proceedings. This minor infraction pales in comparison to the travesty of justice unfolding in this case, yet it has been weaponised to distract from the prosecution’s failures.
A Call for Transparency and Live Streaming
The deliberate misinformation emanating from this trial underscores the urgent need for transparency. The Kanu family humbly calls on Justice James Omotosho to allow live streaming of the proceedings. This case, which carries global interest and significance, demands real-time access to counter the propaganda and falsehoods peddled by government-controlled media. The gagging of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s family and legal team from conducting live interviews after court sessions only serves to embolden the prosecution’s deceitful tactics.
A Travesty of Justice
The Nigerian government’s conduct in this case is an embarrassment to the judiciary and a betrayal of the principles of natural justice. Justice Omotosho has demonstrated commendable impartiality, yet the prosecution’s desperation to distort facts and manipulate public perception threatens the integrity of the trial. The media’s complicity in spreading lies, such as the baseless claim that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu admitted to inciting violence, is indicative of the pressure exerted on journalists to serve as mouthpieces for the government’s agenda.
Our Resolve
The Kanu family will not stand idly by while Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s reputation is unjustly maligned. We demand that media outlets retract their false reports and focus on the substance of the case: a prosecution built on lies, unsubstantiated allegations, and procedural violations. We call on the public, both in Nigeria and globally, to reject the government’s propaganda and demand accountability.
This case is not a legal proceeding but a circus orchestrated to silence a man who has fearlessly advocated for the rights of his people. We urge all lovers of justice to join us in condemning this travesty and to support our call for live streaming to ensure the truth is no longer distorted.
● Prince Kanu issued this statement on behalf of the Kanu Family.
