National Assembly replies President: We are not your rubber stamp for budgets

In a tit for tat exchange, the House of Representatives, Wednesday, told President Muhammadu Buhari, that if he had sent in his budget proposals in September 2017 as expected  of him, it would not have been delayed for seven months as he lamented.
He was also reminded that his own men in the Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs) delayed passage by failing to show up to defend their estimates, a situation they say made him give them marching orders to the Assembly to do the needful.
Employing the same bite and massage method as the President earlier in the day, the House in a statement by its spokesman, Hon Abdulrazak Namdas
Chairman, appreciated the President for signing the 2018 Appropriation Bill into law but made scathing observations, which the Senate, through its own spokesman, Senator Aliyu Sabi Abdulahi, in another statement endorsed, promising further comments.
The observations of the House, backed by the Senate, are:
“That the budget is usually a proposal by the Executive to the National Assembly, which the latter is given the constitutional power of appropriation to alter, make additions, costs or reduce as it may deem necessary. The Legislature is not expected to be a rubber-stamp by simply approving the Executive proposals and returning the budget to Mr. President. Therefore, the additions Mr. President complained of in his speech are justifiable.
“We are on the same page with Mr. President in his desire to return our budget cycle to January-December. By the provisions of the Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA), 2007, the budget estimates should be with the National Assembly around September of the year. In the case of the 2018 budget, the estimates came behind schedule in November 2017, even though this attempt was seen as one of the earliest in recent years. Going forward, we urge the Executive to speed up the reporting time to the National Assembly by complying fully with the FRA.
“Besides, there were delays that should be blamed on the heads of MDAs. Mr. President will recall that he had to direct ministers and heads of agencies to go to the National Assembly to defend their proposals. This came after the National Assembly had persistently raised the alarm over the non-cooperative attitudes of these government officials. On this grounds, the delay in passing the budget cannot be blamed on the legislature.
“(On) new projects in budget… we have to remind Mr. President that we are representatives of our people and wish to state that even the common man deserves a mention in the budget by including projects that will directly affect his life positively. Some of the projects designed by the executive, as high-sounding as their names suggest, do not meet the needs of the common man.
(On) National Assembly budget, before 2015, the budget of the National Assembly was N150billion for several years. It was cut down to N120bn in 2015 and further down to N115bn in 2016. In 2017, the budget was N125bn and N139.5bn in 2018. This means that the budget of the National Assembly is still far below the N150bn in the years before 2015.
“While we commend Mr. President for a good working relationship, we also wish to state that we have a job to do, which requires adequate funding as well. The additional costs and projects to the budget were done in good faith for the sole purpose of improving the lives of Nigerians.
“Finally, we welcome the proposal by Mr. President to forward a supplementary budget to the National Assembly to address other areas of pressing demands and commend the President and the entire executive arm for a cordial working relationship.”