29.8 C
Lagos
Saturday, December 21, 2024

Supreme Court dismisses PDP’s, Adebutu’s appeal on Ogun PDP governorship nomination

Must read

By Yemi  Oyeyemi, Abuja

The Supreme Court on Monday in Abuja dismissed an appeal brought before it by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) on the lingering legal battle on the nomination of its governorship candidate in Ogun State.

The apex Court ordered that the suit instituted by one Jimi Adebisi Lawal, a governorships aspirant, be remitted to the Federal High Court for a fresh trial.

Justice Ibrahim Saulawa in a judgment in the appeal of PDP held that the Federal High Court was wrong in declining jurisdiction in the matter of Jimi Lawal.

The apex court agreed with the Court of Appeal in Abuja that the high court has jurisdiction under section 285 of the 1999 Constitution and section 84 [14) of the Electoral Act 2022 to hear the matter of Lawal on its merit.

The Supreme Court, therefore, ordered that the case be remitted to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court in Abuja for determination by another judge other than Justice Taiwo Taiwo, who refused to entertain the suit.

Justice Saulawa in a unanimous judgment of a five-man panel of justices of the apex court ordered that the high court must speedily hear the case of Lawal against Oladipupo Adebutu and PDP within the time allowed by law.

Jimi Lawal, who contested the May 25 governorship primary election of PDP, had challenged the emergence of Oladipupo Adebutu alleging that an unlawful delegates list was used by PDP to conduct the election.

Among others, Lawal had prayed that the purported primary election of May 25 be cancelled and another one be conducted with the authentic adhoc delegates.

However, Justice Taiwo Taiwo of the Federal High Court in his judgment delivered on July 29 declined to hear the suit of Jimi Lawal on the grounds that the primary election was a domestic affair of a political party and dismissed the suit.

Not satisfied, Lawal approached the Court of Appeal in Abuja with a prayer that the decision of the high court be voided and set aside on the ground of miscarriage of justice.

A three-man panel of Justices of the Court of Appeal in their judgment delivered on September 30 agreed with Jimi Lawal, set aside judgment of the high court and ordered that the suit be heard on its merit..

The PDP, not satisfied with the Court of Appeal decision, approached the Supreme Court on October 14 praying that the judgment of the Court of Appeal be rejected and that of the Federal High Court be upheld to the effect that the conduct of the primary election is its domestic affair.

But Justice Saulawa disagreed with PDP holding that by virtue of Section 285 of the 1999 Constitution and Section 84 of the Electoral Act, 2022, the Federal High Court has power to hear the case of Jimi Lawal.

The Apex Court proceeded with an order to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court to reassign the case to another judge for retrial on its merit.

- Advertisement -spot_img

More articles

Related articles