26.4 C
Lagos
Thursday, September 19, 2024

Court stops FG’s alleged bid to deduct $418million from state governments account

Must read

By Yemi Oyeyemi, Abuja

Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal high court Abuja on Friday stopped the federal government from going ahead to deduct $418million from the bank account of the 36 states governments of the Federation.

The Judge issued a restraining order against the federal government following an exparte application argued by counsel to the 36 states Jibrin Otukepa (SAN) and Ahmed Raji SAN.

While moving the application. Otukepa who led the legal team of the states told the Judge that the states would be completely crippled if the federal government should go ahead to deduct the huge amount from the bank accounts of its clients.

The Senior lawyers told the Judge that the federal government predicated the plan to deduct the $418million from the state governments accounts monthly to service a debt for contracts allegedly executed for the states.

However, Otukepa said that the 36 states Attorneys-General have scrutinised the purported contract and judgment and found that the states were not parties to court action that resulted in the judgment debt.

He further submitted that the purported contract claimed to have been executed for the states are not known to any of the 36 state governments and is therefore a phony contract.

The Senior lawyer further told the court that the federal government was the only party to the court case that brought the judgment and therefore such judgment is not binding on the state governments.

After listening to the arguments of the 36 states, Justice Ekwo ordered the federal government not to go ahead to make any deduction from the states’ accounts in respect of the purported court judgment until all issues relating to it are fully determined.

Defendants in the suit are the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Finance Minister, Accountant General of the Federation and all banks in Nigera, among others.

The Judge fixed the matter for November 30 and ordered the plaintiff’s lawyer to serve all processes on the defendants before the adjourned date.

- Advertisement -spot_img

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related articles